<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your honour, this evidence contradicts the witnesses last statement.</title>
	<link>http://kybernetikos.com/2007/02/21/my-definition-of-web20/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 13:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Création site internet bretagne</title>
		<link>http://kybernetikos.com/2007/02/21/my-definition-of-web20/#comment-23473</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 19:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kybernetikos.com/2007/02/21/my-definition-of-web20/#comment-23473</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Création site internet bretagne...&lt;/strong&gt;

Merci pour cet article intéressant. Bien à vous…....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Création site internet bretagne&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Merci pour cet article intéressant. Bien à vous…&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kyb</title>
		<link>http://kybernetikos.com/2007/02/21/my-definition-of-web20/#comment-454</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kybernetikos.com/2007/02/21/my-definition-of-web20/#comment-454</guid>
					<description>http://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?project=Macintosh&amp;story=On_Xerox,_Apple_and_Progress.txt

In many ways, the computing world has made remarkably small advances since 1976, and we continually reinvent the wheel. Smalltalk had a nice bytecoded multi-platform virtual machine long before Java. Object oriented programming is the hot thing now, and it's almost 30 years old (see the Simula-67 language). Environments have not progressed much either: I feel the Smalltalk environments from the late 1970's are the most pleasant, cleanest, fastest, and smoothest programming environments I have ever used. Although CodeWarrior is reasonably good for C++ development, I haven't seen anything that compares favorably to the Smalltalk systems I used almost 20 years ago. The Smalltalk systems of today aren't as clean, easy to use, or well- designed as the originals, in my opinion.

We are not even _close_ to the ultimate computing-information- communication device. We have much more work to do on system architectures and user interfaces. In particular, user interface design must be driven by deep architectural issues and not just new graphical appearances; interfaces are structure, not image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?project=Macintosh&#038;story=On_Xerox,_Apple_and_Progress.txt' rel='nofollow'>http://www.folklore.org/StoryView.py?project=Macintosh&#038;story=On_Xerox,_Apple_and_Progress.txt</a></p>
<p>In many ways, the computing world has made remarkably small advances since 1976, and we continually reinvent the wheel. Smalltalk had a nice bytecoded multi-platform virtual machine long before Java. Object oriented programming is the hot thing now, and it&#8217;s almost 30 years old (see the Simula-67 language). Environments have not progressed much either: I feel the Smalltalk environments from the late 1970&#8217;s are the most pleasant, cleanest, fastest, and smoothest programming environments I have ever used. Although CodeWarrior is reasonably good for C++ development, I haven&#8217;t seen anything that compares favorably to the Smalltalk systems I used almost 20 years ago. The Smalltalk systems of today aren&#8217;t as clean, easy to use, or well- designed as the originals, in my opinion.</p>
<p>We are not even _close_ to the ultimate computing-information- communication device. We have much more work to do on system architectures and user interfaces. In particular, user interface design must be driven by deep architectural issues and not just new graphical appearances; interfaces are structure, not image.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rosemary</title>
		<link>http://kybernetikos.com/2007/02/21/my-definition-of-web20/#comment-286</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kybernetikos.com/2007/02/21/my-definition-of-web20/#comment-286</guid>
					<description>Thank goodness!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank goodness!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kyb</title>
		<link>http://kybernetikos.com/2007/02/21/my-definition-of-web20/#comment-284</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kybernetikos.com/2007/02/21/my-definition-of-web20/#comment-284</guid>
					<description>Well spotted, I've fixed it now thanks....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well spotted, I&#8217;ve fixed it now thanks&#8230;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rosemary</title>
		<link>http://kybernetikos.com/2007/02/21/my-definition-of-web20/#comment-281</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kybernetikos.com/2007/02/21/my-definition-of-web20/#comment-281</guid>
					<description>sECOND PARA...4 LINES DOWN.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sECOND PARA&#8230;4 LINES DOWN&#8230;..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Rosemary</title>
		<link>http://kybernetikos.com/2007/02/21/my-definition-of-web20/#comment-269</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2007 21:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://kybernetikos.com/2007/02/21/my-definition-of-web20/#comment-269</guid>
					<description>THEY HAVE BEEN SHARING PUBIC DIARIES....???.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THEY HAVE BEEN SHARING PUBIC DIARIES&#8230;.???.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
